When do you want the next 72hrjam?

Discussion in 'Contests' started by LeSwordfish, Jan 7, 2017.

?

When should we hold the jam?

  1. 10th-13th February

    40 vote(s)
    51.3%
  2. 17th-20th February

    20 vote(s)
    25.6%
  3. 24th-27th February

    20 vote(s)
    25.6%
  4. 3rd-6th March

    19 vote(s)
    24.4%
  5. 10th-13th March

    22 vote(s)
    28.2%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Fr0Z3nR

    aa Fr0Z3nR フレイヤスメルズ

    Messages:
    6,333
    Positive Ratings:
    4,721
    Precedence says no to the Strange quality items, but it may be worth the ask.
     
  2. Yrr

    aa Yrr An Actual Deer

    Messages:
    910
    Positive Ratings:
    1,578
    how would quality be rated tho if people are averse to judging loads of entries
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. Asd417

    Asd417 L7: Fancy Member

    Messages:
    452
    Positive Ratings:
    276
    I think it will be pretty easy to distinguish 5 min scrap and 40 hours map. After all, people who show dedication should get the 'better' medal right?
     
  4. Fr0Z3nR

    aa Fr0Z3nR フレイヤスメルズ

    Messages:
    6,333
    Positive Ratings:
    4,721
    Something worth noting using this logic of comparing time taken is that, for a new mapper, it may take them 10 hours to make something that I could do in an hour. It's not a bad metric, but need to consider the person who's doing the work too. 40 hours from a noob, vs 40 hours from a pro will produce WIDELY different results in comparison.
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
  5. Idolon

    aa Idolon the worst admin

    Messages:
    1,257
    Positive Ratings:
    3,413
    There's a fundamental problem in that we can't do any sort of formal judging procedure (the only real judging procedure we do is the showcase, which is created in a fairly arbitrary manner), and so creating a reward that actually had an assigned value is never going to be fair. There's no getting around this. The medal can only really exist because all it is is a participation pin, anything more than that and we're back to square one.

    The rule about eliminating low quality work would exist mostly just to scare people into trying harder. Plus, deciding whether or not an entry counts is already an arbitrary process (as earlier stated, it has to be), so we'd just use it as a caveat so that we can exclude entries that we know for certain are low effort. When in doubt, the entry counts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  6. Crash

    aa Crash func_nerd

    Messages:
    2,808
    Positive Ratings:
    3,776
    The original build of Probed was made in 10 hours on the last day of a 72hr contest. Most of that layout was there for the final version of it.
     
  7. TyeZenneth

    TyeZenneth L6: Sharp Member

    Messages:
    307
    Positive Ratings:
    251
    And on the flipside of that my 72hr maps take up between 50 to 60 hours and never get finished because they're garbo.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Fantasmos

    aa Fantasmos

    Messages:
    841
    Positive Ratings:
    890
    and probed got in the game, I hardly think you care about a participation medal. The mappers that would be able to produce quality in that time-frame already have their medalions, maps in game, or famous maps.

    Also, the medal would then represent continuous participation, not quality (which is the map maker's medalion's role).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Dr. Orange

    Dr. Orange L6: Sharp Member

    Messages:
    284
    Positive Ratings:
    193
    Perhaps the existing medal can have a stat that counts how many 72 hour jams you have participated in?
     
    • Like Like x 7
  10. Diva Dan

    aa Diva Dan not a furry

    Messages:
    556
    Positive Ratings:
    594
    Oooooh, good idea! We could level up our pins by participating often, like a soul gargoyle or campaign stamp.
     
  11. Crash

    aa Crash func_nerd

    Messages:
    2,808
    Positive Ratings:
    3,776
    There are plenty of great mappers and content creators out there not part of our community. The whole point of the jam is to branch out.
     
  12. Fr0Z3nR

    aa Fr0Z3nR フレイヤスメルズ

    Messages:
    6,333
    Positive Ratings:
    4,721
    Precedence say that this is probably not going to happen as it requires extra work on Valve's end. If this was the case, we wouldn't necessarily be getting UGC Season 1,023 Medals every 6 months. (If I'm incorrect though, let me know!)
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Fantasmos

    aa Fantasmos

    Messages:
    841
    Positive Ratings:
    890
    If participation involves mapping for less than one day then they're coming to the wrong community. If they can make a small 10 hour project then they should make two for instance.
     
    • Respectfully Disagree Respectfully Disagree x 4
  14. Crash

    aa Crash func_nerd

    Messages:
    2,808
    Positive Ratings:
    3,776
    That's a silly arbitrary requirement. Plus, the jam isn't just mapping.
     
  15. Fantasmos

    aa Fantasmos

    Messages:
    841
    Positive Ratings:
    890
    Well Swordo asked for suggestions to deal with the low quality coming in, if someone does low effort with tons of skill should they still get rewarded? I'd rather promote effort as opposed to quality and working for an extended period (including preplanning) seems like the most black and white filter to enforce for entrants.

    Also I know its not just about mapping, but its not like the logic doesn't apply across other aspects.
     
    • Respectfully Disagree Respectfully Disagree x 2
  16. TyeZenneth

    TyeZenneth L6: Sharp Member

    Messages:
    307
    Positive Ratings:
    251
    This feels entirely against the spirit of a jam, IMO.
    It's like you want to punish people for being creative under pressure and not adhering to your deadlines.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Fantasmos

    aa Fantasmos

    Messages:
    841
    Positive Ratings:
    890
    I don't want to punish, I would rather just see refrainment from rewarding low-effort. I don't see how creativity or pressure comes into play in this scenario over one where judging would be of quality (which suffer from creativity and pressure).
     
  18. TyeZenneth

    TyeZenneth L6: Sharp Member

    Messages:
    307
    Positive Ratings:
    251
    Time is not a proper metric for rewarding effort. Over the years I've been here I've seen people at plenty of 72 hr events, people both veteran and novice, produce some astounding things under extremely limited windows of time.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  19. Fantasmos

    aa Fantasmos

    Messages:
    841
    Positive Ratings:
    890
    That's a metric of quality, not effort. It doesn't dispute how time isn't a fair way to measure effort

    edit: yes i'm aware sword asked for quality not effort, but I would like to argue effort is a better reward system for the jam.
     
    • Respectfully Disagree Respectfully Disagree x 2
  20. Crash

    aa Crash func_nerd

    Messages:
    2,808
    Positive Ratings:
    3,776
    My entire point was that I was capable of making a map that eventually got accepted into the game in 10 hours, last second rushed for a 72hr jam. There are mappers and content creators out there better than me that are not part of our community. Demanding they come in and spend at least two days here or their content doesn't count is arbitrary and not actually any sort of metric of quality. Time does not equal quality.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6