@YM So now you're just critiquing signatures rather than addressing an actual problem?
Apparently yes
@YM So now you're just critiquing signatures rather than addressing an actual problem?
I've stated my views, it's up to the site staff to actually affect any changes, not me.@YM So now you're just critiquing signatures rather than addressing an actual problem?
Not necessarily... they often include contact information and links to helpful threads too. (Or just fluff stuff, like dubtrack)All they do is advertise your own maps, and most people could care less about the quotes.
I still see that as information that people visiting would look for, or people new here. It seems like most of the offenses of overly large sig's are either advertising maps or directed at visiting people, that's just a generalization I'm making. :shrug:Not necessarily... they often include contact information and helpful/interesting links and information, too.
How is it that unchecking this is not the solution to this problem?
If you hate signatures so much, turn them off. Putting restrictions on the entire forum because a few people don't like it is just silly.
Yes; in fact, this discussion is what brought about my knowledge of them.Aren't signatures turned off by default?
Just because I hate the really dumb ones, doesn't mean I should disable the good ones as well, and a majority are non-intrusiveIf you hate signatures so much, turn them off. Putting restrictions on the entire forum because a few people don't like it is just silly.
Yes; in fact, this discussion is what brought about my knowledge of them.
Just because I hate the really dumb ones, doesn't mean I should disable the good ones as well, and a majority are non-intrusive
Edit: It may even be best to have a system where rather than disable all of them, you can just disable a particular user's.
But who's to say what is and is not intrusive? You could say majority rules here, but it's difficult to know if it is a majority or just a few grumpy people.