Because it's visual static. If you get feedback from non-mappers complimenting your map, good. I'm happy for you. But from one mapper to another, your map is significantly over-detailed and non-nonsensical. You can continue saying "why not?" but I'd highly encourage you to ask yourself "why" more often when you're detailing. Things need to be places for a reason, otherwise it's just chaos. As for the addition of the eclipse as an after-thought, it is apparent. I'd encourage you to make it more significant as a story aspect in your map otherwise it just seems pointless. You named your entire map after it, shouldn't it have some baring on the events in the map? Anyway, you can take what I say as you will. If you believe your map is perfect as is then feel free to ignore me. I hope I can give it a playtest sometime so I can give better feedback on the gameplay.