***Mapping Contest #7 Voting thread***

Which deserves to win?

  • #1 - dullestbulb

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #2 - Apom

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #3 - cornontheCoD

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #4 - nubcake

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #5 - Youme

    Votes: 8 8.5%
  • #6 - Ezekel

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #7 - MungoKing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #8 - Lss40 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #9 - Lss40 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #10 - Velvet Fist Iron Glove 2

    Votes: 16 17.0%
  • #11 - Velvet Fist Iron Glove 1

    Votes: 8 8.5%
  • #12 - omega322

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • #13 - Vander

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #14 - BladeMasterPsi

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #15 - pitto

    Votes: 4 4.3%
  • #16 - Fearlezz

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #17 - Void

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • #18 - Pink Panther

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #19 - MrMuffinMan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #20 - Sgt Frag

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #21 - Jazz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #22 - Tech

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #23 - >NameLess<

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • #24 - ikem

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • #25 - ABBAttoir

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • #26 - Big Rexy

    Votes: 17 18.1%
  • #27 - A Boojum Snark

    Votes: 26 27.7%
  • #28 - Drexen

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814
Awesome jobs guys.. a real shame i've missed out on this wonderful competition. I've laid my vote though it was hard to choose between voting for something original versus one that just looks nice versus what would look like it would play well (cause you never really know unless you play it). But i guess it's gonna be hard to avoid TF2 Cliché when the system in mapping for it is gonna be to try and be cliché about it. :p
 
Last edited:

Sgt Frag

L14: Epic Member
May 20, 2008
1,443
710
I also built my cubmaps fully! O.O
Seems kind of weird that even though some of us built them and checked to make sure they works after the compile and yet they didn't work for some people. :confused:

Well I know my cubemaps didn't work because the file name was changed and I'm sure whoever changed it didn't rebuild cubemaps for me (as they still point to the name I gave it).

I would've thought that wouldn't have been overlooked. While I didn't expect to win, and after seeing other entries I know I wouldn't have anyway, I do think it effects how people see it. I know before I double checked mine I went into another map that was all bright pink and while it looked like cool terrain it deffinately lost out beause I couldn't see it for what it was.

But for me it was to just join in and see what I could whip up in a few hours so it was a fun experience and if anyone wants to use it it's gonna need cubemaps built again anyway.
 

dullestbulb

L1: Registered
Mar 20, 2008
20
1
Speaking of the voting methods why not break it off into a type of bracket system of voting. Whenever there is a contest with a large amount of entries, break em off into smaller groups of 5 (or whatever). These smaller groups would get their own thread or poll allowing for more votes from each person. Then the winner of each group goes on to the final vote where it faces the other 4 winners.

Qualifiers:
Poll 1: map #1-5
Poll 2: map #6-10
Poll 3: map #11-15
Poll 4: map #16-20
Poll 5: map #21-25

Finals:
Poll 1 Winner
Poll 2 Winner
Poll 3 Winner
Poll 4 Winner
Poll 5 Winner

Everyone gets a single vote in each poll. And with it now divided up without such a large selection, I think this would allow the community to digest the map selections a little better and easier.

Sorry if its hard to understand...
 
Last edited:

YM

LVL100 YM
aa
Dec 5, 2007
7,158
6,079
For this one I'll run a top 5 poll next week unless one entry pulls drasticly ahead of the others in that time.
For future contests with lots of entries I'll look at alternative methods.
 
Dec 25, 2007
566
440
As this contest was primarily about looks, I used that as my primary criteria in deciding which to vote for. And there were a lot of really cool maps here -- the screenshots don't really do them credit -- so making a final choice wasn't easy.

In the end, I voted for Ezekel's little cave, because although sparse, the details were well balanced, and the overall effect was very pretty, and visually well balanced.
 

Pink_Panther

L3: Member
Dec 14, 2008
129
45
I decided to go through every map and give a review of each. I made a score scale that i found to be fair to everyone and cover all the sections of 'detail'...so here goes. Each map got about 20 minutes of review and typing time (so do the math on the time spent on this)

my full review of each map is here http://pinksrealm.com/External/IntelContestReview.txt, there are comments for all evaluated criteria and points breakout. Please read it so my time wasnt wasted.

I am brutally honest about my review, i dont care about egos just stating my view of what i find.
--------

Intel Positioning: 1-10 points
-its an intel map, so the position of the intel in the room is key to how well the map works. Is it too close or too far from the entrance? Is it hidden? Multiple routes for players to reach it? Defendable?

Originality of Concept: 3,5,or 7 points
-I have seen the basic concept before = 3; seen the idea, but is a variant = 5; Havent seen it before or extreame variance = 7

Lighting: 1-10 points
-Lighting color, location, too many or too few lights all take effect and influence players reaction to the map. Is it too bright, monochrome, or too dark? Do i get nausiated by the flashing green lights? etc

Use of Shadow: 1-5 points
-the counter balance of lights. Use of shadow gives depth on a flat screen. It also can make interesting effects. It can also make spots where people can disappear giving unfair advantage. Were shadows made with concern to these effects?

Room layout: 1-15 points
-this is the physical layout of the room. Multiple entry points, defensability, etc? Are there errors in the construction such as gaps? are the walls and floors just a single flat brush?

Use of Textures: 1-10 points
-textures form the base of everything we see. are the textures correctly chosen? are they aligned? do they match the theme of the room? does the lighting cause the texture to look 'wrong' (shadows on the wrong side, color clashes, etc)

Props and extra details: 1-5 points
-these are the items that have no point other than asthetics (Some prop usage can go with room layout). Are they positioned well? Do they fit the theme? Is every chair lined up and facing the exact same direction like they are copy/paste and looks unnatural?

Use of sounds: 1-5 points
Maps are very flat when theres no sound... so, were there sounds added? fit the theme? only ambient or functional and random ones too?

Submission Date: 10-1 points
-entries posted at the end of the timeline have an advantage over the earlier entries. They are usually 'better' because they can evaluate the compation and get ideas they wouldnt have used otherwise. So, to balance that out...everyone gets 10 points, then 1 point is taken away for every two days after the first entry was posted.

Overall Impression: 3-7 points
-is it something I want to play? Is there something wierd or wonderful about it that doesnt fit the other catagories? (yes, this is a very opinionated section thats why there is less fluctuation in the points)

Total Point Range: 14-84 points

------
Dullestbulb: 44
Apom: 59
cornonthecod: 44
nubcake: 28
youme: 69
ezekel: 61
mungoking: 52
Lss40 #1: 38
Lss40 #2: 46
velvet fist iron glove #1: 60
velvet fist iron glove #2: 60
omega322: 60
vandar: 53
blademasterpsi: 50
pitto: 42
fearless: 59
void: 42
pink_panther: skipping mine
mrmuffinman: 30
sgt frag: 55
jazz: 40
tech: 53
nameless: 50
ikem: 63
abbattoir: 42
big rexy: 64
boojum snark: 66
drexen: 61
fogold: 28 note: name was not on voting list, thats not very fair to fogold at all
----------
Hopefully i didnt miss any

remember there is a full review of every map with comments on every section with a points break out at http://pinksrealm.com/External/IntelContestReview.txt.
 

dullestbulb

L1: Registered
Mar 20, 2008
20
1
Thank you so much Pink_Panther!!

Even though I got a 54% according to your system, you pointed out all my flaws in a nice way. Prior to your comments, the only comment I really received something on was lighting, which is god awful. Without your critique I would have continued with flawed brushes, lack of sound, and cruddy texturing. Thanks again.
 

A Boojum Snark

Toraipoddodezain Mazahabado
aa
Nov 2, 2007
4,776
7,674
Submission Date: 10-1 points
-entries posted at the end of the timeline have an advantage over the earlier entries. They are usually 'better' because they can evaluate the compation and get ideas they wouldnt have used otherwise. So, to balance that out...everyone gets 10 points, then 1 point is taken away for every two days after the first entry was posted.
I have to question the validity of this one. :mellow:
What can an egypt map steal from a spytech, or a spytech from an alpine? Not all participants have the "ability" to borrow ideas and so there would be no reason to penalize for submitting after everyone else.
Did you actually notice anything that looked directly inspired from another entry?
What about someone who was away and only found out about the contest half way through?

Personally, I began work with a plan in mind before anything was submitted, and completely intended to submit on the last day. I figured why submit early and then wish I'd changed something when I can just hold off and keep perfecting things as I find them. I did this so I could make my entry the best I could... but I get penalized for it?

That said, I'm just making my observation, not being sore, I've been tied for the lead and you otherwise scored me highly, which I appreciate. :) and I thank you for actually taking the time to review all the entries.

Speaking of scoring me high, I'm rather amused you gave me an 8 for intel location. I actually felt the location was pretty bad for play, but I designed with looks in mind and would've restructured that side of the room had I intended it to be played.
 

Rexy

The Kwisatz Haderach
aa
Dec 22, 2008
1,798
2,533
I will say this is a tight and exciting contest! Nice work everyone.
 

Pink_Panther

L3: Member
Dec 14, 2008
129
45
I have to question the validity of this one. :mellow:

i know some would disagree with this one and its not a huge factor in the scoring overall. Those that took their time normally outscored the difference in other aspects. This was an attempt to even the playing field between the fast mapping styles and the slow and methodical. If those that got theirs in first had taken time on more details in most cases their scores would have been higher.

As for taking a concept and using it, thats impossible to say because nobody can say what someones thought process is when creating something. But, there is a distinct advantage to those that submit later because they get to see their competition and conceously or subconceously adjust their map to be 'better'. This give some points to those that take a risk and submit early without knowing what is to come.

Overall, its a criteria that i think is fair and designed to even the playing field. Heck, even mine would have been a low score on that item.

even though there is a score on every map, its meaningless. Everyone did an excellent job and every map was impressive. Some had that good first impression then started finding oddities, and some were the opposite where i found those little tidbits of excellence that were amazing to a 'veteran' mapper like myself.


DullestBulb. you were right on par with everyone. a 42 would be an average map out of a group of highly skilled mappers and even then the highest score was a 69 (82%). And I would put mine around 45ish in that scale. Always room to do more and get better at what we do.
 
Dec 25, 2007
566
440
desk is manned by people with no legs apparently
:D

Great reviews, Pink_Panther! Very good feedback, you picked up on a number of things I'd not really considered.
 

pl

L5: Dapper Member
Mar 6, 2009
248
55
For me, this was quite a close vote between Pitto and Youme. But I vote Pitto, because I think he has gone the extra step with his. Everywhere you walk (apart from the dev textures) is just beautiful. I like the feeling that the room is nice and spacious because it lets you be able to see (almost) everything at a glance.

Good job Pitto! I also did really like a lot of the other entries, but I think this one stood out most for me :)
 

Apom

L6: Sharp Member
Sep 14, 2008
366
65
My turn to do a review! Great thanks to Pink Panther for his own, of course. I'm not myself going to do such a ting as giving ratings etc., since the purpose here is to select only one entry, I already eliminated a number of them by looking at the screenshots (not just one of them, but all the ones that were provided in the upload thread). Yes, that would be a bad method if I intended to actually rank all entries. But the point is, I didn't, so essentially any entry with a couple of critical defects was not going to make it - and defects I could see on a screenshot were obviously not going to disappear by running the .bsp.

Please note before reading that I did not judge gameplay at all, only visuals (with two specific exceptions that I will explain). Also, I am extremely picky with metal beams: if you don't see any other comment than one about metal beams, know that's it's already enough to me.

#1 Dullestbulb |I'm not convinced by the floating panels. More importantly, the noticeable presence of red textures (window frames, wooden desk) in a blue base feels inappropriate. On the plus side, the fly-through video is appreciated.
#2 - Apom |I think that's me :]
#3 - CornOnTheCod |The concrete pillar that's somehow pierced to let a metal beam pass through looks strange. The other metal beam is only half-positioned, so that half of the screws are in thin air.
#4 - Nubcake |General feeling of emptiness and lack of detail. The metal ceiling looks weird, you'd expect it to be concrete.
#8 - LSS40 #1 |Detailing isn't bad, but the completely uniform lighting makes it almost look like a fullbright map.
#9 - LSS40 #2 |The scaffolding is highly unrealistic (the transversal beams don't support anything), and those electric panels would probably be safer if protected from weather conditions by at least a minimal door. Also, what's the pulley doing up there?
#11 - VelvetFistIronGlove #1 |Metal beams without apparent screwplates :(
#14 - BladeMasterPsi |I think the mix of concrete and wood is a failure. That's too bad, because it looks pretty good otherwise.
#15 - Pitto |The glass looks waaaaay to thin to support people walking on it (let alone battle damage)!
#16 - Fearlezz |Even though the rest looks good, the railing is so central in this room that you can't afford to mess with it. In this case, the props overlap in a very visible fashion, and the fixtures (that should be on a vertical wall) are seen sticking out of the ground.
#17 - Void |The walls (and probably ceiling too) are too bland and undetailed. Those parts that are detailed are nice, but there aren't enough of them.
#19 - MrMuffinMan |By making a room with such a high ceiling, you aren't taking the easy way, because you run the risk of it feeling empty. You should probably have done a lot more work on the walls, or more easily lowered the ceiling :p
#20 - Sgt Frag |The spotlights are much too wide compared to the props they emanate from. More importantly, the lighting is completely uniform (I couldn't find a single shadow), which doesn't do justice to the nice detail work.
#21 - Jazz |While this is overall a good entry, I think you went a bit "cheap" with the workload. Really, this is just a pair of cubes + pyramids and a volley of stairs. You probably spent time on the "trap" thing, which admittedly is a nice addition, but not enough to compete with the best. Also, I'm not sure about the ceiling opening, as I would have preferred a more "entombed" ambiance (with only torches, no skylight).
#22 - Tech |Another occurence of beams without screwplates :( Also, some walls look somewhat empty and could probably use some more props/overlays.
#28 - Drexen |You really need an env_tonemap_controller, the HDR is killing me. And for god's sake, don't upload screenshots in .bmp format :angry:

Okay, so after this pre-selection, the other entries are the ones I actually played because they looked like good contenders and/or had some fresh ideas I wanted to check out.

#5 - Youme |Who would have guessed that Youme's entry wouldn't conform to the name scheme? :D Excellent sunset ambiance and gorgeous displacements as usual. The details around the "room" are excellent. Unfortunately, the "room" itself feels... Empty, somehow. This would be an excellent point of passage in a regular map, but as a place that receives focus... I don't know, it lacks some luster.
#6 - Ezekel |The water inside the cave seems to appear and disappear at will (because you have different water levels), which is a turn off and prevented me from appreciating it. The smoke at the base of the waterfall is totally killing my FPS when I look at it, you went way overboard with sprite density. Further, because of one of these two things (or their conjunction), your map made my computer crash :/
#7 - MungoKing |It's really small. While I liked the lightbulb's fixture and the ceiling falling apart, the construction light's attachment looks very artifical (it should be attached by the handle, shouldn't it ?). The yellow spots on wooden pillars that hold the lanterns are distracting. Also, the wooden support wall stops somewhat abrubtly, without being properly terminated (whether by rock or a larger wood piece).
#10 - VelvetFistIronGlove #2 |My favorite map after seeing the screenshots. Unfortunately, it didn't turn out as well in-game :( The whole room is dark and the only part that stands out is the very bright desk. This makes it difficult to enjoy the rest of the detail work. Also, viewing it from ground level definitely doesn't have the same qualities as the somewhat aerial screenshot you took.
#12 - Omega322 |A solid entry. I found a couple of minor texture continuity issues, but I had to look for them. The most disturbing part is the flag staircase itself: it's not aligned with the "entrance" between the two pillared walls, because one of these two walls is longer than the other but you still used a central symetry to place the staircase. Also, the displacement here is disturbing: shouldn't it have a lower elevation in the centre and higher elevation close to the walls, rather than the opposite?
#13 - Vander |An excellent take on the archeologic egyptian site. The scaffold next to the hieroglyphs is brilliant. While I didn't find any major flaw, there were a small number of minor flaws that, when accumulated, prevented it from taking first spot: different textures on the disjointed bricks, a light leak at the base of the broken wall, one of the wires that goes through the stairs. I also think that some lightspots on those construction lights would have made for an even better atmosphere.
#18 - Pink Panther |Nice job with the spacebase theme, it often ends in catastrophic failure. The flag "cage", although nice, is probably too complicated, but that's arguable. I think the most notable problem is your use of glass textures - badly aligned, badly scaled, visible brush transitions (interior faces should be set to invisible).
#23 - NameLess |An excellent entry. The skybox is fantastic and the room itself is high quality too (of course, you get bonus points for using my props :D). Wires with a rope texture are noteworthy as well. On the bad side, the blue lighting in the corridors is a mistake that's already been commented on, I also noted that the pillars in the other corridor (the one you don't spawn in) are too short, they don't reach the ceiling (and the one in the corner visibly overlaps with a copy of itself). On a more structural note, the log as a support doesn't convince me, it should be on the edge of the wooden extension for that, not leave it hanging.
#24 - ikem |A fine entry, probably the one with the strongest atmosphere in this contest. The pipework is most excellent. Unfortunately, there were a couple of overlapping brushes and props (including right in the player's face at the spawn point), some of the class-themed props on the table seemed to be floating, and the blue light was... well, too blue. I mean, too much "#0000FF", not enough TF2 blue.
#25 - ABBAttoir |An excellent entry, simple and effective. The underwater part is just perfect, and the side rooms are cool too. However, the glass texture on the windows doesn't really fit, so there is a visible transition between the first 512 units and the rest. I'm not entirely sure about the gray metal ceiling either (that's arguable). One of favorite entries.
#26 - Big Rexy |Excellent job with a sci-fi theme. I think the real problem is with playability. I said I wouldn't judge gameplay, but in this case, your moving platforms are so central that one can't ignore the way they interact with gameplay. And it's too easy to mess around with the platforms so that they end up in bad places, have you drop of them when you shouldn't, etc. I praise you for trying, still. The only visual problem I could find is texture alignement in the metal struts that surround the moving parts, these should be 45°-angled rather than brutally cut each other at 90° (you hardly look up there, so it's really nitpicking).
#27 - A Boojum Snark |Wow. There are so many awesome things in this entry that I do'nt know where to start. Complex and yet realistic wiring job, fantastic usage of skybox props, best usage of metal beams I've ever seen, a background that's good enough to be featured separately, dislodged tiles that reveal underground pipes, perfectly shaped staircase, self-illuminated ground shape... I have one single complaint: the desk zone is bordered by that door threshold texture that totally ruins my video card's anisotropic filtering - which is okay for a door threshold as you'll only look directly at it if it's close, but annoying for distant vertical surfaces.
 

Sgt Frag

L14: Epic Member
May 20, 2008
1,443
710
I have to question the validity of this one. :mellow:

I'd have to agree also. Submission date should only count if someone is late, then maybe docking points, but even then... if a late entry was OK'ed...

But seriously, I spent about 4-5 hours on mine the last day possible, I just got an urge to do one, before I didn't really want to. So should I be docked for having a different schedule or motivation? Should someone else score more because they threw the first submission up?

-----------
I do appreciate the more thorough posts. Nice to have specific feedback, I know I slacked in this area myself.
-----------

An idea for submission could be that NOBODY shows their work pre voting. In another commuinty we did ALOT of contests. In each one you could have a few beta testers, but nobody else saw your submission. You could ask for help and people could know you're competing, but they can't see it until it's finished.
Even the beauty mission required a workable gamemode to at least see them in game.
All voting was based on going in game in each map. Still, the authors names weren't released util the contest voting was over.

I think this could be a very good way to do a contest. Then there is no question of 'lifting' someones work. Nobody releases early. Nobody has any expectations. All they know if they have a bunch of maps they have to go in game and see for themselves. They vote on the work.
Then everyone finds out who did what at the end.
--------------
I think having a major vote, then a top 5 is a good way to go. At least that way we pin down the more popular ones, then get a vote on those which will help pick a true winner as votes are concentrated on those now.

I think having seperate poles 1-5, 6-10... would be unfair. Obviously everyone in Boojum's poll would lose towards a last poll, even if the second best was in that group. Voting would then come down to which maps were grouped together.
Great maps could not go to finals, terrible maps could.
 
Last edited:

RavenStryker

Former Alias: †Blade†/Xi.Cynx
aa
Nov 25, 2008
782
849
Pink Panther: Thanks for the detailed review. It really made a lot of sense and I can use that for future critiques. I made it brighter cause I figured people would rather have a room that they could fully see in as opposed to one that they had trouble seeing in certain areas. Cause it was a lot darker at one point before I rendered HDR as well.
 

A Boojum Snark

Toraipoddodezain Mazahabado
aa
Nov 2, 2007
4,776
7,674
I have one single complaint: the desk zone is bordered by that door threshold texture that totally ruins my video card's anisotropic filtering - which is okay for a door threshold as you'll only look directly at it if it's close, but annoying for distant vertical surfaces.
I'm surprised I never noticed that. :blink: Looking at the screenshot now it sticks out like a sore thumb. Totally would have changed that if I'd paid attention (it was a rather arbitrary texturing choice as it was)
 

Pink_Panther

L3: Member
Dec 14, 2008
129
45
I'd have to agree also. Submission date should only count if someone is late, then maybe docking points, but even then... if a late entry was OK'ed...

its debatable either way. Thats why I broke out each section and anyone can throw out anything they dont agree with and re calculate. It's just the criteria that I used to get to the meaningles answer 'who should win'. I would have rather seen a option for 'everyone' myself.
 

Ida

deer
aa
Jan 6, 2008
2,289
1,372
Thanks for the review, Pink Panther. I'm somewhat disappointed in myself for managing to score second lowest according to you, and I definitely take the criticism and I agree on most points.

However, I don't see how you can grade the entry on submission date. An entry is an entry, the submission date has nothing to do with its quality. The contest rules also clearly stated that nothing needs to be functional, which means I don't quite understand why you included sound (I can't remember more than a handful of entires that had sound), clipping and nodraw faces in the evaluation.

Either way, I appreciate the feedback. Great effort. :)