Those with SC2 Beta
- Thread starter grazr
- Start date
I'm Will you butt
p_stone03[at]hotmail[dot]co[dot]uk
Well I preordered, unfortunately a few days after they stopped giving out keys >.<
But then I saw this http://www.incgamers.com/News/22928/no-intercontinental-starcraft-ii-friendships
And was like "Fuck you blizzard"
Then swiftly cancelled my order.
What the fuck are they thinking. Are they really that stupid to think that no intercontinental support is OK?
It seems pretty much any game that comes out now has some major thing that makes me think any non-valve developer is plain retarded.
But then I saw this http://www.incgamers.com/News/22928/no-intercontinental-starcraft-ii-friendships
And was like "Fuck you blizzard"
Then swiftly cancelled my order.
What the fuck are they thinking. Are they really that stupid to think that no intercontinental support is OK?
It seems pretty much any game that comes out now has some major thing that makes me think any non-valve developer is plain retarded.
The Gentlemanne
L4: Comfortable Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 170
- 94
Trotim
aa
- Jul 14, 2009
- 1,195
- 1,045
And somehow I really doubt that SC2 will be able to be better than WC3. Especially considering all this B.Net2 nonsense.
Quality of the game means absolutely sod all. If I can't play with the people I want to then the game is only fit for the bin.
Zwiffle
L6: Sharp Member
- Jun 24, 2008
- 269
- 161
I'm sure that in the long run, with enough whining, Blizzard will add intercontinental play and hopefully chat channels, as well as all the other stuff we would expect. I doubt that just because it's not in the beta it will never happen.
Still, it does seem odd not to already include some of those things.
Still, it does seem odd not to already include some of those things.
The Gentlemanne
L4: Comfortable Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 170
- 94
SC1 is a single diamond excreted from the sphinctre that is Blizzard. Probably, because all the shit they spout out to gamers at one point got so clogged up the pressure could only release into a beautiful game.
SC2 has A LOT to live up to and i doubt it will beat what SC1 and Brood Wars became. But SC2 should prove to be a good game in average standards, and i am looking forward to the campaign more than the multiplayer (which is too competitive for my liking). Which is ironic because i thought the SC1 campaign was lacking whilst the multiplayer was the more entertaining part.
SC2 has A LOT to live up to and i doubt it will beat what SC1 and Brood Wars became. But SC2 should prove to be a good game in average standards, and i am looking forward to the campaign more than the multiplayer (which is too competitive for my liking). Which is ironic because i thought the SC1 campaign was lacking whilst the multiplayer was the more entertaining part.
Trotim
aa
- Jul 14, 2009
- 1,195
- 1,045
What the hell made you say that? Have you ever heard of Warcraft 1, 2, 3? And although I don't like WoW either you can't honestly be saying that it's a bad MMORPG.
Please, you people. Blizzard knows what they're doing and I refuse to believe they jumped the shark now. If anything it's Activision's fault. That said, I am not going to buy Starcraft 2 and am instead moving back to Warcraft 3.
Last edited:
Radaka
L420: High Member
- May 24, 2009
- 491
- 244
You can play with "real ID" friends cross-country, just not normal friends. Real ID friends get to see your real name and more specific information on what you are currently doing, such as if you are viewing the post-game scores screen as opposed to just "online".
I have Aly on my real ID friends and I'm pretty sure that we can set up a game and play right now.
I have Aly on my real ID friends and I'm pretty sure that we can set up a game and play right now.
Radaka add me Intayla656@yahoo.com (i think you have me added anyway)