End of the world as we know it
- Thread starter Armadillo of Doom
- Start date
OOEH BURN!!
Well I'm sure everything will be fine
. At least we europeans think things trough before doing something :laugh:. Nah just kidding. It'll be fine
TheDarkerSideofYourShadow
L10: Glamorous Member
- Apr 12, 2008
- 792
- 286
Hahaha, thats funny.
Oh, and I don't think we'd attack it with an army or anything. Just drop a few nukes (or neutron bombs maybe). Basically, all of Europe's problems can be solved with bigger bombs :-D
Oh, and I don't think we'd attack it with an army or anything. Just drop a few nukes (or neutron bombs maybe). Basically, all of Europe's problems can be solved with bigger bombs :-D
How stupid, If it COULD make a black hole capable of destroying the world (which it can't) then hacking the computers and potentially screwing up their equipment will only make it more likely....
Besides, if the world does get swallowed up it would happen so fast you'd barely have time to realise it wasn't an earthquake before you were the size of a single atom and without consiousness.
That indian girl who killed her self because 'she didn't want to see the end of the world'....... See how ignorant jeornalism has done equal-to-more damage than the collider itself (one man was killed in its construction) but he died in the progression of human knowledge about the universe, she died because some stupid jeornalist was too retarded to understand the facts given to them.
The problem is people thing that the fact it will recreate the big bang means there will be an explosion of some sort, but in actual fact if the particle colision were to happen less than an inch from your eyeball with nothing in between you and it (not even an eyelid) you would be 100% unharmed. The whole thing snowballs because jeornalists are push to make exciting headlines so anything along the lines of end of the world is great for them, but bad for the public, since they're just as uncapable of understanding the facts the scientists might give them, but they're getting a missinterpreted version to start with, so what hope have they got, then they tell their own friends even more distorted facts and you end up with people killing themselves because of it.
Basicly: "If you're a jeornalist and you write articles about stuff you don't understand and thus get it wrong (read: you are a jeornalist), I despise what you are doing to our world"
/rant
Bring on the discovery of the higgs-boson, I really want to know how this higgs field works and what implications it might have for future technology (stuff like MRI scanners couldn't have been made without all the particle research at places like cern so who knows what posible technology might come from the discoveries the LCH makes)
Besides, if the world does get swallowed up it would happen so fast you'd barely have time to realise it wasn't an earthquake before you were the size of a single atom and without consiousness.
That indian girl who killed her self because 'she didn't want to see the end of the world'....... See how ignorant jeornalism has done equal-to-more damage than the collider itself (one man was killed in its construction) but he died in the progression of human knowledge about the universe, she died because some stupid jeornalist was too retarded to understand the facts given to them.
The problem is people thing that the fact it will recreate the big bang means there will be an explosion of some sort, but in actual fact if the particle colision were to happen less than an inch from your eyeball with nothing in between you and it (not even an eyelid) you would be 100% unharmed. The whole thing snowballs because jeornalists are push to make exciting headlines so anything along the lines of end of the world is great for them, but bad for the public, since they're just as uncapable of understanding the facts the scientists might give them, but they're getting a missinterpreted version to start with, so what hope have they got, then they tell their own friends even more distorted facts and you end up with people killing themselves because of it.
Basicly: "If you're a jeornalist and you write articles about stuff you don't understand and thus get it wrong (read: you are a jeornalist), I despise what you are doing to our world"
/rant
Bring on the discovery of the higgs-boson, I really want to know how this higgs field works and what implications it might have for future technology (stuff like MRI scanners couldn't have been made without all the particle research at places like cern so who knows what posible technology might come from the discoveries the LCH makes)
I would love to have a handheld matter generator.
Shadow Scythe
L2: Junior Member
- Aug 8, 2008
- 51
- 0
On a lighter note, http://www.HasTheLHCDestroyedTheEarth.com/ will provide you with a valuable summary about if the LHC destroyed the earth. Ho-hum.
00000000000000000000000
L4: Comfortable Member
- Jul 9, 2008
- 175
- 23
Don't guys if you're really that worried about it you can watch it 24/7 on this site:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
Youme said:
It kinda makes me think of the film 28 days later. In their ignorance animal rights activists set deseased animals free, trying to be "moral" about things but only causing the downfall of eventually the world (as seen in 28 weeks later).
Things like that agitate me to no end. Thankfully, that still remains in a science fiction film.
