When you start playing with _____ that can aim, they are amazingly OP.When you start playing with scouts that can aim, they are amazingly OP.
It is hard to take an argument seriously when you put out stuff like this. In an actual game the sentry is a hard counter to the scout. Again, we can invent all sorts of unlikely scenarios where the scout blows up sentries, kills seven engineers with only his bat and than caps the point, but the majority of the time this simply isn't the case.What? A scout can take out a sentry gun. Just circle strafe it. Not that hard.
It is hard to take an argument seriously when you put out stuff like this. In an actual game the sentry is a hard counter to the scout. Again, we can invent all sorts of unlikely scenarios where the scout blows up sentries, kills seven engineers with only his bat and than caps the point, but the majority of the time this simply isn't the case.
At the end of the day, a scout can't bonk a sentry. If CEVO took itself seriously it would say to the players "well, maybe you dumbasses should try something other than two scouts, two soldier, a medic and a demo." There are other classes, and the bonk banning only demonstrates how the "pro" player base has decided this arbitrary setup is the only way to play TF2 and they want to preserve THAT status quo.
Not being able to adapt is a sign of a failed system.
The bonk is obnoxious, a shitty design decision, and generally un-fun. However, I would say the same about the competitive scene. The way they twist TF2 to suit their own means than turn around and say "you nubs don't understand, we know what we are doing" is laughable. As the heavy would say, cry some more.
maybe its just me but i have lost all respect for any kind of competitive league after the crap ive heard...so...yeah...
and unless a sentry is places in a really stupid place where there are no remotely good players around and the scout can get close enough to circle it without dying then a scout can not circle strafe a sentry
I'm more interested in what you have to say. Putting the the onus on me to parse your interpretation of other people's words is a lousy way to make it point.Well, 1 you didn't read those threads did you?