Increased Police Violence in OWS protests

English Mobster

L6: Sharp Member
Jul 10, 2011
355
299
Occupy Los Angeles here.
While I myself aren't making extended stays over at the protest site, a lot of my friends have been camped out there for the last month or so. I've visited from time to time, and it really is well-organized, considering there are no official leaders.

Since I wasn't really anything more than a visitor to the movement (my day job is freelance journalism for a local paper, while I support the cause and donated $20 to the movement, a tight college schedule keeps me from getting too heavily involved), I can only speak for the 3 or so days I spent there and the notes I gathered for my article. Even so, it was nice to see them welcoming me into their community. Everyone there was nice, and it really made me feel a sense of community, a group of people coming together as one for a common cause.

From what I've seen, nearly everyone does their part. There's a nice medical tent with plenty of supplies and medics offering services (for free, mostly!). They also have people picking up trash and sorting trash and recycling and churches from all faiths (and a few atheist organizations) handing out bread and water.
They have some chefs as well, who make pretty good food using what they have on hand and will also give it out. These guys, while they would let you have it for free if you were in need, do have a "recommended donation" thing going on, so it's not COMPLETELY some communal system.
While I haven't stayed overnight terribly often, everything seems well. I'm certain you guys have heard what it's like.


If I have one complaint about the camps, it's the strained relations between some of the members. A little under a quarter are homeless and staying in the camps because of the free room and board, and it's creating friction with those who are trying to pass a message.
While the tensions aren't that high and anyone you speak to will tell you they're more than happy to take care of the homeless, after spending a couple nights there you can tell that the homeless sit around, get drunk, don't clean up, don't help in the protests, and don't help out in general. The pictures you see bashing OWS in the media (and the crimes in general) can usually be linked back to these homeless people, from what I've seen.
They need to be taken care of, and everyone is welcome here. To not take care of them or to force them to leave is contrary to our message, but the fact a majority of them don't really do too much (don't get me wrong, there are more than a couple who DO help out) is beginning to form some cracks in the movement, at least in Occupy LA. We just hope they would help out a little more, but for the most part, things over at OWS are fine and dandy, at least on our end.

We're getting kicked out on Monday.

Mayor says we're obstructing the liberties of others by removing the park from public use. But anyone can walk in; you don't need to donate or stay, people visiting the park are more than welcome to do so. Accommodations have been made for those who don't want to come near the camps, everything's clean and tidy.

Yet apparently Mayor Villaraigosa, despite repeatedly claiming that he would NEVER violate our constitutional rights, that the stuff you see in the other cities would NEVER happen in his city, the man always saying he supports the movement 100%, says that we must leave.

I had been camping out with an old high school friend, currently going to UCLA. He says he isn't leaving, and the consensus seems to be that in the face of arrest, we'll sit in our tents and have them drag us to our jail cells. Most of the tents are staying; I have classes and such to attend on Monday, so I'll have to hear either from him or from the news how it went.

They have a few classes going on about proper civil disobedience and defense against police brutality and how to protect against tear gas. Everywhere there is emphasis on being non-violent, about keeping cool and letting level heads prevail. If worst comes to worst, a few areas have set up places to let you know where to find good attorneys who will help you for free should you be arrested as part of OWS.

There are ominous eviction notices around the encampment, and the police, while friendly currently, are becoming more and more everpresent. 12:01 Monday morning is the deadline (Pacific time), and I have no doubt there'll be the same sort of stuff you saw in New York. I won't be a part of the civil disobedience come eviction time, but LA is going to be on the news in the next few days, same as New York and the other occupy protests.


E: To be relevant to the current thread of discussion, the legality of the ability to kick us out is also questionable. To kick us out is to violate the First Amendment right of Freedom of Assembly, and any arrests made will be thrown out of court.
They're trying to nab us on laws that say we can't stay overnight at the park, which begs the question of whether it is right to enforce a law if it hurts the rights of others.
The Supreme Court has traditionally sided with the notion that encampments and occupations are legal and cannot be broken up in THAT context, under THOSE laws.

However, LA is also citing "public safety", not a general law, but more of an idea that such a large gathering will cause more crime and disease within the city. Not something I personally saw in the camp, but one can definitely get that idea if they take a look at where the majority of the homeless folk I spoke of earlier hung out. Again, that's less than a quarter of the living areas of the camp, possibly not even 10%. While still maintained to the best of our ability, each area is in general tended by those who live there. Many of the people in the homeless area don't do much to tend their area of the camp, and while again we have nothing against them, it's that area that the media and the cities are using against us.
If THIS issue is brought between the Supreme Court, they have traditionally sided with the idea that ANY threat to public safety is a lawful reason to violate the Bill of Rights. That's why if someone shoots a firearm up in the air at a rally (not OWS, just an example), the police have a right to converge on that rally violate freedom of assembly by breaking it up, as it is now considered a threat to public safety.

So it is really a matter of how the court looks at it. If they try to book us on camping illegally, the city has no right to remove constitutional protections as long as we are trying to spread a message. If they get us on public safety, which is much broader and more open to debate, there are certainly areas of the camp where you are more likely to find something missing should you leave it in a tent you have nearby, areas with more trash and broken beer bottles on the ground. That is when they can legally come in and kick us out, provided they don't use excessive force.


One thing I liked about my time in OWS was a sign I saw posted in the park. It read something along these lines (not verbatim, as this is from memory, but fairly close):
"If we find a man with his house full of newspapers, we call him crazy. The same thing with a woman with her house full of cats. But if we find someone with a house full of money, we put them on the cover of Fortune magazine and are told to look up to them as role models."
I asked my friend if he knew where the quote was from, and he said that he wasn't sure, but that he had heard it was from an ex-Canadian Prime Minister. If any of you Canadians know it, please do tell so I can cite it correctly.



Also, Frozen, I see no report button on the left side. Or at all. I've never had to/wanted to use it (maybe on one post), but that's always mystified me about this site. Where is it?
 
Last edited:

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814
LIke always you guys are using the exceptions, not the rules. I agree, those police people are going out of their way to be "bad" (for lack of a better word), but just because 10 people are bad doesn't mean they all are. The occupy protesters have been warned that action would be taken to remove them if they did not remove themselves. Like I said before though, I do not agree with the actions taken!!! Just use fire-hoses, they clear out people well enough, and they are extremely "non-lethal"

You do realise this happened across the entire of New York, right? I swear you don't even read this stuff before making comments.

Police officers were given the go ahead by the mayor to utilise force they didn't have the authority to use. Now the police and the mayor are under investigation by the chancellor.

You can't just say "they were warned, they got what they deserved", because nobody deserves to have military grade weapons used on them during peaceful protests. It's the equivilant of me saying i'm going to burn your house down tomorrow, if you're in it when it happens and you die that's your own fault because i warned you, even though i had no right to burn your house down in the first place. They are not showing any kind of force besides their shere mass of numbers and the majority when arrested go without incident.

These weapons are self defence tools, not crowd control.

EDIT:
Also, Frozen, I see no report button on the left side. Or at all. I've never had to/wanted to use it (maybe on one post), but that's always mystified me about this site. Where is it?

That's weird, there used to be 3 little icons at the bottom left of each post and one was the report tool. I've used it myself a couple times but didn't notice it had actually gone missing until you mentioned it just then.
 
Last edited:

Terwonick

L6: Sharp Member
Aug 25, 2010
278
190
You do realise this happened across the entire of New York, right? I swear you don't even read this stuff before making comments.

You can't just say "they were warned, they got what they deserved"

These weapons are self defence tools, not crowd control.

Ah, what? did you read MY post? I clearly stated that this type of force was completely out of hand! Look, once again you are pointing your finger to the extreme, if somebody knows of previously enacted policies and laws, then they shouldn't intentionally do something against it. ***UNLESS*** it directly hurts them or affects their freedom.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100213183721AAly6qW If you look at the top answer then you hear it echo'd that if you need to use force, then you should go all out. I DON'T AGREE WITH THAT!!!!! but would you rather the police use live ammo on the people???? Cause that's all I'm really getting from your guys' posts (excluding E. Mobster)

E. Mobster, I'd just advise you not to get involved at this point, just stay out of it, for your own safety!
 

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814
Then i don't understand what you mean by "10 people", 'cause the implication was that this was a one off incident. When it was not. It was city wide in New York and occuring in other cities across the US as we speak.

And i never said you didn't read my post, i said you should read the sources cited.

But the point being police intervention at all is unnecassery or at least illegal at this point.
 
Last edited:

Verumae

L1: Registered
Jun 16, 2011
33
55
As a wealthy, spoiled child, I don't even care.

I'm about to help you guys out a lot by telling you that these sorts of things are slanted to make OWS seem victimized. Here's the thing: These "occupations" are not lawful.

Prime example: Occupy Oakland.

They drove away business from the park. They utterly destroyed the park. Several fights between the protestors. One confirmed murder. They were told to get out of the park and violently came back a few weeks later.

They weren't innocent. I'm not saying the actions of the police are justifiable, but please, figure out the context of a video first.
 

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814
Here's the thing: These "occupations" are not lawful.

"Freedom of assembly, sometimes used interchangeably with the freedom of association, is the individual right to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. The right to freedom of association is recognized as a human right, a political freedom and a civil liberty."

"Freedom of assembly and freedom of association may be used to distinguish between the freedom to assemble in public places and the freedom of joining an association. Freedom of assembly is often used in the context of the right to protest, while freedom of association is used in the context of labor rights and the Constitution of the United States, is interpreted to mean both the freedom to assemble and the freedom to join an association."

The United States recognises the freedom to assemble under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Also i don't really know how to respond to your utterly biased comments. You provide no sources of information and go so far as to undermine your own arguements with comments like, "I'm from a rich family and don't care".

The OP talks about police activity and the arrests of journalists to censor police aggression, please keep to the topic, your ranting and raving about the 53% already got 2 threads locked. Lets keep things light hearted here please.
 
Last edited:

Verumae

L1: Registered
Jun 16, 2011
33
55
Freedom of assembly, sometimes used interchangeably with the freedom of association, is the individual right to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend common interests. The right to freedom of association is recognized as a human right, a political freedom and a civil liberty.

"Freedom of assembly and freedom of association may be used to distinguish between the freedom to assemble in public places and the freedom of joining an association. Freedom of assembly is often used in the context of the right to protest, while freedom of association is used in the context of labor rights and the Constitution of the United States, is interpreted to mean both the freedom to assemble and the freedom to join an association."

The united states recognises the freedom to assmble under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Yes, they have the right to assemble, I'm not arguing that. However, that right does not override laws. The protesters have been harming the economy, the environment, police officers, each other, buildings, civilians, etc.
 

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814
Yes, they have the right to assemble, I'm not arguing that. However, that right does not override laws. The protesters have been harming the economy, the environment, police officers, each other, buildings, civilians, etc.

Lol. where's the source of this information? Please do tell. This sounds exagerated, there are no laws being broken, you should read into it more, the very fact that no laws have been broken is exactly why this movement has been allowed to last as long as it has.

With the acception of anarchist individuals looking for conflict and without association to the OWS movement, and homeless people, the entire thing appears to have been remarkably civil.
 
Last edited:

owly-oop

im birb
aa
Apr 14, 2009
819
1,215
tumblr_luqbamuCH71qdit3oo1_500.jpg



my favorite police brutality thing that happened was when a policeman pepper sprayed and kicked a pregnant woman causing her to miscarriage. she was trying to leave the protest after it wasn't peaceful anymore as far as I know, each article about this is slightly different so I don't know the exact details for sure.


not all policemen are bad, but the "good" policemen should do something about it. There's a bunch of police brutality reports out there. it's not the quantity that makes me mad, it's that the policemen get minimal punishment, "administrative leave" or something, when anyone else would get a worse punishment.
 
Last edited:

Sel

Banned
Feb 18, 2009
1,239
2,570
As a wealthy, spoiled child, I don't even care.

I'm about to help you guys out a lot by telling you that these sorts of things are slanted to make OWS seem victimized. Here's the thing: These "occupations" are not lawful.

Prime example: Occupy Oakland.

They drove away business from the park. They utterly destroyed the park. Several fights between the protestors. One confirmed murder. They were told to get out of the park and violently came back a few weeks later.

They weren't innocent. I'm not saying the actions of the police are justifiable, but please, figure out the context of a video first.



Every time you post I want to hurt myself.

Maybe you should hire someone to post better for you and actually do a little research with all your money.

Oakland has a violent crime rate of 27%, anyone blaming their Occupy protest for someone getting shot near them needs to have their head examined.


The occupiers have consistently worked with police where possible, especially if they actually have a reason for them to come in and keep the camp safe, for example the man in Atlanta open carrying an AK.

Also funny, I watch a lot of independent reporters, and corporate media and I haven't seen people destroying the park, beating the shit out of each other all day, or partaking in the kind of behavior that you seem to keep claiming they're partaking in.

What I have seen are people protesting peacefully, and getting indiscriminately attacked by the police.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEj_4fqDbnM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwo5eumXxyA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH5Y6SNZc9k
 

Fruity Snacks

Creator of blackholes & memes. Destroyer of forums
aa
Sep 5, 2010
6,394
5,571
Verumae, where is the source that the protest is violent?

You just showed us links of either accidents or a single person being stupid and trying to stir up trouble. I know from experience that its really easy for people outside of a protest to peg a whole movement/protest is "Violent" and "Stupid" just because 1 or 2 people are being idiots. I believe that is what you are doing.


As I mentioned, please keep this civil and respectful I don't mind this thread being up, its nice to talk about these events, but not when its just people slinging insults.
 

Verumae

L1: Registered
Jun 16, 2011
33
55
You just showed us links of either accidents or a single person being stupid and trying to stir up trouble. I know from experience that its really easy for people outside of a protest to peg a whole movement/protest is "Violent" and "Stupid" just because 1 or 2 people are being idiots. I believe that is what you are doing.

did you really just post this
I mean you're a smart guy and all but why
I'm sure you think that those people don't represent the protests as a whole, but here's the thing: they're still protesters
basically, if OWS wasn't there, EMT folks wouldn't have their legs broken, protesters wouldn't be getting raped, people could sleep at night, cops wouldn't have rocks thrown at them, etc

it only takes a few bad apples to ruin it for everyone

also guys, police don't just pepper spray people for no reason, stop thinking that
 

grazr

Old Man Mutant Ninja Turtle
aa
Mar 4, 2008
5,441
3,814

An old lady being treated by a medic protestor? This article also states that a car purposefully knocked over 3 protestors. It looks like most of the violence is coming from right-wing sympathisers.


This isn't a protestor, it's a junkie out for free food from protestors who has been asked to leave every day, by protestors.


These are people attacking the OWS protestors, not the other way around.


A violent individual.


A criminal prior to OWS movement exploiting the kind and trusting nature of the protestors.


An accident.

"Before the incident Wednesday, Mayor Bloomberg defended the protesters as law-abiding folks who keep to themselves and don't cause trouble.

"I will say, in all fairness to the people down there, we watch very carefully, they generally do not break the law," Bloomberg said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program Wednesday... ...When they protest, they march in a line, they stay on the sidewalks, they follow the direction of the police, they exercise their First Amendment rights."

As Frozen already pointed out, you've just pasted some random links to violence which have little relavence to the protesters.
 
Last edited:

PoisonHeadcrab

L1: Registered
Jun 27, 2010
14
0
Which videos are these, then? I havn't actually seen any and that's also baring in mind that the American Right-Wing have injected (traced) millions of USD into the media to fuel a smear campaign against OWS. Evidence of misconduct by protesters has been flimsy at best.

It's interesting to watch this from the UK where our media is less affected by media tycoons such as Rupert Murdoch (38th richest man in the US), who has his hands in most of the US media networks. He's already had 2 papers over here shut down for illegal activity and The Gaurdian refused to be bought out by said media tycoon so i have a fair amount of respect for their integrity as journalists.

Post them up, i'd very much like to see these so called violent protests.

Now that's indeed quite a shame I must say, I didn't know they were manipulating media this badly... However I watch/read rather Swiss than American media, and the videos I was talking to were mostly made by protesters and put up on youtube. I could bring some examples where people would comment on police violence when in the video you see how protesters provoke and assault police, which leads to clashes between them. Selentic's example is a hard contrast tho, I'd fully agree that's some unjustified police violence there...

What I see in most cases though is how many people think they can oppose the police force and at the same time expect them to back down because "it's just some peaceful protests".
I'm not saying every protester is like this, I even believe the overwhelming majority is peaceful, but as long as there is any violence from protesters, there will be violence from police.
 

English Mobster

L6: Sharp Member
Jul 10, 2011
355
299
For the most part, none of the cops I've seen WANT to be violent. I've seen them milling about the camp, making friendly chit-chat with the protestors. I even overheard a long conversation between a cop and a protester about Skyrim.

The problem comes when ONE cop is afraid.
Even if everyone is peaceful and nobody is resisting, there are still 100 people for 1 cop. If ONE cop gets a little nervous and begins brandishing a weapon, even without the intent to use it, OTHER cops see an officer who is forced to resort to a weapon, and they respond in kind.
This leads to the main part of police violence, and once that starts... well... violence is fun.
Why do you think GTA, TF2, or any number of murdering games are so successful? Violence is fun. And because the protestors aren't going to attack the police officers to the extent of endangering the officer's safety, they will have no immediate reason to NOT have fun.
This awakens the inner sociopath of an officer. Mind you, again, not ALL police officers are like this. But it takes a certain mindset to want to become an officer. They typically are very authoritarian, they typically like being in charge of those below them and typically are very respectful of those above them.
They also typically are filing paperwork and giving traffic tickets in a job they probably joined so they could shoot bad guys. In their mind, they have all these toys and they never get to use them.
So the moment they think for a second that a fellow officer is using force, they may as well join in. Something clicks, and then all hell breaks loose. Even if nobody had done anything and ONE officer was just afraid of crowds. Someone sees someone else with a weapon drawn and considers it okay to draw theirs, and once the weapon is drawn, he loses his mind.
Here's an academic article on the subject that goes into more detail.
 
Last edited:

Fruity Snacks

Creator of blackholes & memes. Destroyer of forums
aa
Sep 5, 2010
6,394
5,571
For the most part, none of the cops I've seen WANT to be violent. I've seen them milling about the camp, making friendly chit-chat with the protestors. I even overheard a long conversation between a cop and a protester about Skyrim.

Occupy Whiterun.
 
Last edited: