- Dec 25, 2007
- 566
- 439
Just for a laugh, I decided to calculate roughly my post quality, using "thanks" as an indicator.
I've got 243 posts, and have been thanked 75 times for 34 posts. So:
34/243, or 14.0% of my posts are useful. I've got on average 75/34, or 2.2 thanks per useful post, and have an average thanks rate of 30.9%, i.e. 75/243.
Calculating the same for Youme - he has 2116 posts, and has been thanked 256 times for 125 posts. So:
5.9% of Youme's posts are useful. Youme has on average 2.0 thanks per useful post, and has an average thanks rate of 12.1%.
Just goes to show, quality is better than quantity
So, how do you stack up in comparison?
I've got 243 posts, and have been thanked 75 times for 34 posts. So:
34/243, or 14.0% of my posts are useful. I've got on average 75/34, or 2.2 thanks per useful post, and have an average thanks rate of 30.9%, i.e. 75/243.
Calculating the same for Youme - he has 2116 posts, and has been thanked 256 times for 125 posts. So:
5.9% of Youme's posts are useful. Youme has on average 2.0 thanks per useful post, and has an average thanks rate of 12.1%.
Just goes to show, quality is better than quantity
So, how do you stack up in comparison?