- Feb 14, 2008
- 1,051
- 932
At the event, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, Phil Schiller, compared the PSP and Nintendo DS to the iPod Touch, claiming that the handhelds "don't stack up". To support this, he went on to mention that games available for Sony and Nintendo's machines were too expensive and paled in number to Apple's offering - 21,178 via its App Store, compared to 607 PSP and 3,680 DS releases.
Schiller mentioned that the big positives going for the iPod Touch included its inexpensive game range, multi-touch interface, App Store and the fact that the competitors are "no iPods". Sony is set to counter Apple's downloadable game threat with the introduction of Minis on the PSP however - offering bite-sized product for a similar cost. Many iPhone and iPod Touch developers are looking towards Sony's offering, and the Japanese electronics company recently implied that the PSP is a pure gaming device.
What's your response to this? If you watched this guy talking, he came up with lots of stats, and called iPod Touch games "amazing," as you would if you were Apple's VP of Marketing.
Yet, I can't help but feel that he's kind of skipping the point that 95% of the games on App Store are complete and utter crap, I mean, I bought the hugely hyped Super Monkey Ball for it... and it had horrible gameplay.
Apple say that their games are cheap compared to PSP and DS games... which they are, but the best have nowhere near the production values and content that the best DS and PSP games have.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe both the PSP and the DSi have their own online content stores, music playback, web browsers and app functionality, so although the entertainment portion is not as good as Apple's, claiming that the iPod is a better games console because it has an iPod music player on it, is not a legitimately better games console.
/rant