Wikipedia is always unnecessarily complex

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Numerous, Feb 8, 2010.

  1. Numerous

    Numerous L4: Comfortable Member

    Messages:
    150
    Positive Ratings:
    72
    Let me explain. Whenever I look up pretty much anything to do with mathematics, it goes straight to the details, skipping over the general overview which anyone skimming would almost always prefer.
    Here's an example, Euclidean space:
    Now I'm generally a high-flier and at home with this stuff, but if I want to understand it without spending 5 minutes of my life finding the simple definition, I sure as hell can't be on wikipedia.

    Has anyone else noticed that around here?
     
  2. YM

    aa YM LVL100 YM

    Messages:
    7,099
    Positive Ratings:
    5,739
    Mathematics isn't simple, why should wikipedia pretend that it is?
     
  3. pitto

    pitto L3: Member

    Messages:
    109
    Positive Ratings:
    73
    yeah I agree with YM, also it follows the format of all Wikipedia that have a short description to start, then further details below.

    If you are looking at maths on Wikipedia, the best thing to look at are the diagrams and pictures to gain a quick understanding especially if you are just refreshing material you have learnt in the past, but if you have never learnt the maths before I'd expect you need to reed a bit more into it.
     
  4. Caliostro

    Caliostro L6: Sharp Member

    Messages:
    261
    Positive Ratings:
    110
    Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia of pretty much everything. It isn't your school's bibliography.


    What you're asking is like asking for the dictionary to only come with words you personally might look for.
     
  5. Washipato

    Washipato L3: Member

    Messages:
    149
    Positive Ratings:
    96
    I never found wikipedia useful for understanding mathematics, lots of times it give a complete, but over-complicated definition. The best you can do is find another site with google, one that explains the subject in a didactical way, easier to understand and learn.
     
  6. drp

    aa drp

    Messages:
    2,251
    Positive Ratings:
    2,551
  7. A Boojum Snark

    aa A Boojum Snark Toraipoddodezain Mazahabado

    Messages:
    4,767
    Positive Ratings:
    5,508
    TMP says he taught himself calculus with wikipedia. So I think he'd be the one to ask if it really is overly complex... or maybe not :p
     
  8. Okrag

    aa Okrag Wall Staples

    Messages:
    1,029
    Positive Ratings:
    640
    If you want simple...[ame="http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics"]If you want simple...[/ame]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. Sel

    Sel Banned

    Messages:
    1,241
    Positive Ratings:
    1,119
    [ame]http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_geometry[/ame]

    well would you look at that
     
  10. Micnax

    aa Micnax I maek map

    Messages:
    2,018
    Positive Ratings:
    1,338
    Click the 'Simple English' language from the article language selection, if it's available.

    It works almost 70% of the time.