Thanks for all the fish!
- Thread starter The Political Gamer
- Start date
- Status
You're never going to tell who is actually smart by the way they push buttons on a forum.
Also I resent your implication that my thanks are any less significant than Boojum's thanks. I believe they add to your thanked count just the same.
Last edited:
Pooluke41
L5: Dapper Member
- Feb 24, 2010
- 203
- 30
Well I was Over Exaggerating, But I didn't mean it in General, I meant by Boojum, Most of the other Thanks, While if I look through this thread, every one Has one by you, Mostly.
I don't mean to Offend you,
But I was Trying to make a Point Between You Making a Long Wave of Thanks and Others,
I also Don't mean it shows how smart someone is, as I said before I was Exaggerating a bit. I was trying to put across that the thanks show how informative someone is.
And Again I didn't mean to Offend you,
chickenm4n
L1: Registered
- Nov 27, 2009
- 49
- 6
it makes sense either way and there is no grammar error.
I could not care less. Implying that you have hit rock bottom and don't care at all.
I could care less. Implies that you care about it, but you wish that you didn't.
Thanks.
- Apr 29, 2008
- 1,068
- 709
I'm not posting as I'm just thanking the posts I agree with...
Dammit dammit dammit.
Anyway thanks are a nice touch to a forum, I miss them on forums that don't have them. Don't really care how many thanks I get or how many others have though.
EDIT: I voted yes but it has a caveat, the post thanks system most certainly DOESN'T prevent useless posts.
Dammit dammit dammit.
Anyway thanks are a nice touch to a forum, I miss them on forums that don't have them. Don't really care how many thanks I get or how many others have though.
EDIT: I voted yes but it has a caveat, the post thanks system most certainly DOESN'T prevent useless posts.
Last edited:
Trotim
aa
- Jul 14, 2009
- 1,195
- 1,045
absurdistof
aa
- Aug 10, 2009
- 1,240
- 399
Most retarded debate ever :O
Everyone has said it, I honestly don't know why this was brought up and from where TPG drew this motive. Thanks are the post-free way of giving a message that is (in fancy talk: both subjective and objective) open to interpretation while still carrying the underlying message of "hey, thanks." It's that very hey thanks that makes me love it because it's a friendly respectful way of conveying a message.
Also, spud, are you trying to make a point?
Everyone has said it, I honestly don't know why this was brought up and from where TPG drew this motive. Thanks are the post-free way of giving a message that is (in fancy talk: both subjective and objective) open to interpretation while still carrying the underlying message of "hey, thanks." It's that very hey thanks that makes me love it because it's a friendly respectful way of conveying a message.
Also, spud, are you trying to make a point?
Bermuda Cake
L9: Fashionable Member
- Feb 20, 2009
- 679
- 480
lol, spud.
I know thanks can be used anyway the thanker wants, but basically, I think thanks should be awarded when a post is RELEVANT to a thread, so it's fine to thank people who post something funny in an off-topic thread, but if someone goes and makes inside of a whale jokes on whalerace's thread (for example) and gets a whole load of thanks it's pretty stupid.
But at the moment they're still a lot better than "^" or "this." even though some people do that.
I know thanks can be used anyway the thanker wants, but basically, I think thanks should be awarded when a post is RELEVANT to a thread, so it's fine to thank people who post something funny in an off-topic thread, but if someone goes and makes inside of a whale jokes on whalerace's thread (for example) and gets a whole load of thanks it's pretty stupid.
But at the moment they're still a lot better than "^" or "this." even though some people do that.
Last edited:
- Feb 26, 2008
- 1,626
- 1,325
- Status