Caps that arnt neccesary to win

Egan

aa
Feb 14, 2010
1,375
1,721
Hello there.

I've been making a map for quite some time now, and originally i had it as a 5cp map, but there was also another bonus cap that was available for cap at all times. It wasn't necessary to win, and it just gave the owner some bonus stuff. Unfortunately, I ran into some problems and decided to make my own system for a capture point. But people didn't realize it was a capture point.

So I switched it back. Here's what's wrong:
The cap layout is supposed to look like this:
[] [] [] [] []
___ []
But it looks like this:
surf_avatar0148.jpg


Also, the map makes it so i need to cap it to win the match.
Even tho it has no colour, when i cap the rest of the points, i need it to win the game.

So if you know how to fix this, or even need me to explain it better, just reply back

Thanks :)
-Egan
 

Draco18s

L9: Fashionable Member
Sep 19, 2009
622
136
I think you want to set up your team_control_point_master with a CapLayout of <0 1 2 3 4, 5>
 

Draco18s

L9: Fashionable Member
Sep 19, 2009
622
136
I have it set-up that way already, but for some reason it doesn't seem to work.. :/

Try it the other way, <5, 0 1 2 3 4>, just for shits and giggles.

Also, try breaking it up into three groups, rather than two, just to see if it helps, <0 1, 2 3 4, 5>
 

Egan

aa
Feb 14, 2010
1,375
1,721
Try it the other way, <5, 0 1 2 3 4>, just for shits and giggles.

Also, try breaking it up into three groups, rather than two, just to see if it helps, <0 1, 2 3 4, 5>

Ok , so i did that, The cap is separated (which is good, and i guess it could work.)
However, it still makes the blue cap1 unlocked, like its next inline or something.
Red cant cap it, but it still looks weird. :/

surf_avatar0149.jpg
 

ANova

L7: Fancy Member
Jul 16, 2009
415
132
I know this is random Egan but are you a teacher?
 

Draco18s

L9: Fashionable Member
Sep 19, 2009
622
136
Really it only needs the previous 1. Owning that one requires the previous one to that, so you don't need to specify it.

It's only if you have a A+B -> C that you need to specify that C needs both A and B because those two don't need each other.